Numero della rivista 10 2016

L’Influenza delle Minoranze. Cambiamento Sociale o Preservazione dello Status Quo?

• Scritto da Stefano Pagliaro

Ingroup/Outgroup. Per ingroup si intende il gruppo al quale un individuo appartiene; di converso, il termine outgroup indica il gruppo, o i gruppi, ai quali il singolo individuo non appartiene.

Bibliografia

Alvaro, E.M. & Crano, W.D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.

Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 170-190). Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie Press.

Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3-7

Clark, R.D., III (1988). On predicting minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 515-526.

Clark, R.D., III (1990). Minority influence: The role of argument refutation of the majority position and social support for the minority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 489-497.

Clark, R.D., III, & Maass, A. (1988a). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 347-364.

Clark, R.D., & Maass, A. (1988b). The role of social categorisation and perceived source credibility in minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 381-394.

Crano, W.D. & Alvaro, E.M. (1998). Indirect minority influence: The leniency contract revisited. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 99-115.

David, B., & Turner, J.C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the outgroup an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.

David, B., & Turner, J.C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The ingroup minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 115-134.

Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.

Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B.A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.

Jost, J.T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.

Kay, A.C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J.M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M.P. e Spencer, S.J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421-434.

LeVine, R.A., & Campbell, D.T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Levine, J.M., & Kaarbo, J. (2001). Minority influence in political decision-making groups. In C.K.W. De Dreu & N.K. De Vries (Editors), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 229-257). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Lortie-Lussier, M. (1987). Minority influence and idiosyncrasy credit: A new comparison of the Moscovici and Hollander theory of innovation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 431-446.

Maass, A., & Clark III, R.D. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.

Moscovici, S. (1976). Social Influence and Social Change. London: Academic Press.

Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209-239.